White Label SEO CompanyStart a pilot

Quality control

Quality control: the standard every placement must pass

Quality control here is four checks that decide whether a placement reaches your report: relevance, authority range, indexation and anchor sanity. Each one is written down, applied to every link, and visible in the QA sheet you receive. A link that fails any check is replaced at our cost, not reported and hoped about.

  • Relevance judged before metrics
  • DA and DR held between 40 and 95
  • Indexation tracked after go-live
  • Anchors kept plausibly natural

Relevance comes before metrics.

The first question about any publication is whether it genuinely covers the client's subject, or could credibly start to. A gardening client linked from a strong finance site fails this check no matter what the numbers say, because a link that makes no editorial sense is a link that ages badly.

Relevance is the first quality control check, and it is judged by a person reading the site, not by a category field in a database. We look at what the publication has actually run in recent months, and whether our story would sit naturally beside it. The pool that passes runs from specialist titles to national news sites: recent placements have landed on Metro, the Daily Express and The Independent, and every one passed the same reading first.

Authority range: 40 to 95, and why it is a range.

We hold placements inside a DA and DR range of 40 to 95, measured with the common third-party tools. It is a range rather than a single threshold because both scores are proxies, and chasing any exact number invites the sites that are engineered to hit it.

The score is recorded twice: once at prospecting and once when the link goes live, so your report reflects the site as it was on the day, not as it looked when the list was built. A site whose numbers collapse between those two dates comes off the list.

Indexation, tracked rather than assumed.

A link on a page search engines never index does very little. After each placement goes live we track whether the page is picked up over the following weeks. If it is slow, we resubmit it and check again; if it stays out of the index, the placement fails QA and is replaced.

The indexation status appears against each link in your report. Most placements index without help because the publications are real and regularly crawled, which is one more reason the sourcing screens matter.

Anchor sanity.

Anchor text is planned per client at the brief stage and checked per link at QA. The plan leans heavily on branded terms and natural phrases, keeps exact-match commercial anchors rare, and is set against the client's existing profile so nothing we add stands out as manufactured.

We will decline an anchor request that would hurt the client, and say why in writing. An agency can overrule us on strategy, but not into an anchor pattern we believe puts the client's profile at risk; that protects your client and, honestly, our name for careful work.

What fails, and what happens next.

Typical failures: a site that turned out to sell placements in bulk once we looked closely, a page stacked with unrelated outbound links, a publication whose traffic has visibly collapsed, an anchor that drifted from the plan during editing, or a page that never entered the index.

A failed link never reaches your report. It is replaced at our cost, and the replacement runs through the same checks. If a link passes QA and is later removed within 90 days, the same replacement rule applies. The process only counts a link as delivered when it has survived all four quality control checks.

Common questions

Can we see the QA results for each link?

Yes. Every link in your monthly report carries its QA line: the relevance note, the metric snapshot with dates, the anchor as placed and the indexation status. The report is unbranded, so you can pass the whole thing to your client.

Why not only place links on DA 70 and above?

Because a single high score is easy to engineer and easy to resell. A relevant DA 45 news site that genuinely covers your client's field will usually do more good than an inflated DA 75 site that links out to anyone. The range plus the relevance check beats a threshold alone.

Do you use AI to write the placed content?

Drafting tools are used the way any modern newsroom uses them, but every piece is finished and fact-checked by a person, written to the publication's standards, and accepted by its editor. A piece a real publication will not accept is worthless to everyone, so the publication's bar is the bar.

Hold us to the standard.

Run a pilot month and check every link against the checks above. That is what they are published for.

Email info@whitelabelseocompany.co.uk